Orelon logoOrelon
料金

AI Video Prompt Engineering: A Practical Workflow Guide

2026年11月5日 · Orelon Team 著

AI動画テンプレートを見る

着想のためにコミュニティ作品をいくつか閲覧し、任意のテンプレートを開いて Orelon で作成を続けましょう。

Learn how to structure AI video prompts, direct camera and lighting, keep characters consistent, and review renders with a repeatable production workflow.

A prompt is not a wish. It is a shot list compressed into a paragraph. Creators who get usable footage from modern text-to-video models are rarely the ones typing the most adjectives; they are the ones describing a frame the way a director briefs a camera operator — who is in it, where the light comes from, what the lens does, how long it holds, and what changes before the cut.

This guide lays out a repeatable method for writing video prompts, adapting them to different model families, holding characters consistent across shots, and reviewing output so you stop burning renders on guesses. Keep Orelon's AI video generator open in another tab and you can test each idea as it comes up.

Start with the shot, not the story

The most common mistake in AI video is prompting a plot. A model cannot dramatize a three-act arc in eight seconds. It can, however, render a single, legible moment with a clear subject and a clear camera behavior — and a sequence of those moments, cut together, becomes the story.

So before writing anything, answer four questions in plain language:

  • What is the one thing the viewer must see? A hand closing a laptop. A cyclist entering a tunnel. Steam rising off a cup at dawn.
  • Where is the camera? Eye level, low angle, overhead, over the shoulder, locked off.
  • What is moving? The subject, the camera, the environment, or all three.
  • How long does the moment last? Most generations run a few seconds, so design for a beat, not a scene.

If you cannot answer those four questions, no amount of stylistic vocabulary will rescue the output. Write the answers in a notebook, then turn them into a prompt.

The six layers of a reliable video prompt

A prompt that consistently produces good footage usually contains six layers, roughly in this order. Order matters less than presence — but keeping a stable order makes your own prompts easier to debug, because you can swap one layer at a time.

Layer one: subject and action

Name the subject specifically and give it one action with a visible beginning or end. "A woman in her thirties in a paint-stained denim shirt steps back from a canvas" beats "a creative person." Specificity in age, wardrobe, and posture prevents the model from averaging your subject into a generic stock character.

Keep the action singular. Two simultaneous actions (she walks and answers a phone and turns) usually produce mush, because the model interpolates between poses it cannot reconcile.

Layer two: setting and light

Environment sets plausibility; light sets mood and, more practically, sets contrast. Models handle directional light far better than flat light. Say where the key light is: window light from camera left, a practical lamp behind the subject, late sun raking across a wall, overcast diffusion on a rooftop.

Add one atmospheric detail that carries texture — dust in a sunbeam, rain on a car window, steam curling off asphalt. That single detail often does more for perceived realism than any camera specification.

Layer three: camera and lens

Camera language is the highest-leverage vocabulary you have. Useful, model-friendly terms include:

  • Framing: extreme close-up, medium shot, wide establishing shot, two-shot
  • Angle: low angle, high angle, eye level, Dutch tilt
  • Movement: slow push in, pull back, lateral tracking, handheld follow, static tripod
  • Lens feel: 24mm wide with visible perspective, 50mm natural, 85mm compressed background, shallow depth of field

Name one movement, not three. A push in while orbiting while racking focus is a request for visual noise. Choose the move that serves the beat, then let the shot be still enough for the viewer to read it.

Layer four: motion and timing

Describe pace explicitly: slow, deliberate, unhurried, quick, jerky. Add a timing cue when the beat depends on it — for example, the subject turns to camera in the final second, or the camera settles as the light flickers. Timing cues give the model a sense of where the interesting moment sits inside the clip.

Layer five: style and grade

Style should be a short, concrete descriptor, not a mood board. "Documentary handheld look, neutral grade, slight grain" is useful. "Cinematic, epic, beautiful, masterful" is not — those words describe your feelings, not pixels.

If you need a specific reference, describe the reference's traits rather than naming a film: high-contrast sodium streetlights, muted teal shadows, 16mm grain, anamorphic flare. Trait-based style transfers more reliably and keeps your work original.

Layer six: audio and dialogue

Models that generate audio natively reward you for writing sound the way you write light. Specify ambient bed, one or two discrete effects, and — if dialogue is involved — a short line with a delivery note. Keep spoken lines under roughly ten words and make sure the mouth is visible on screen; off-screen speech in a tight shot tends to produce mismatched lip movement.

If you do not want audio in the final edit, say so. Silence in the prompt is not the same as silence in the output.

A copy-ready prompt template

Here is a structure you can reuse and trim. It is deliberately plain — plain language parses better than ornate language.

[Shot size and angle] of [specific subject with distinguishing detail]
[doing one clear action] in [specific location].
Light: [key light direction and quality], [one atmospheric detail].
Camera: [one movement or static], [lens feel].
Pace: [slow / brisk / deliberate], with [timing cue].
Style: [3-5 concrete visual traits and grade].
Audio: [ambient bed], [one or two effects], [optional line of dialogue].

A filled example:

Medium close-up, slightly low angle, of a bicycle courier in a rain-darkened
yellow jacket pulling a parcel from a shoulder bag in a narrow alley.
Light: single overhead lamp from camera right, wet brick reflecting highlights,
light rain streaking through the beam.
Camera: slow lateral tracking right, 50mm feel, shallow depth of field.
Pace: unhurried, the parcel clears the bag in the last second.
Style: documentary realism, cool shadows, warm practical highlights, fine grain.
Audio: rain on metal, distant traffic, jacket fabric rustling.

That prompt gives the model a subject, one action, a light source, a lens, a movement, a pace, a grade, and a soundscape. It is roughly eighty words. Most of the good prompts you will write fall between sixty and one hundred and twenty words.

Tuning a prompt to the model you are using

Different systems weight different parts of the prompt, so the same text can produce very different footage. Rather than memorizing quirks, run a short calibration on any new model before you commit to a project.

  1. Test the camera layer alone. Generate the same subject with a static shot, then a push in, then a tracking move. Note which one the model actually honors; some systems soften or ignore lateral motion.
  2. Test subject adherence. Add one unusual detail (a scar, a mismatched glove, a cracked lens on a pair of glasses) and see whether it survives. This tells you how much wardrobe control you really have.
  3. Test duration behavior. Watch where the model puts the motion inside the clip — early, late, or evenly spread. Then place your timing cues accordingly.
  4. Test text and hands. If your shot includes signage or hand interaction, calibrate early. It is cheaper to reframe a shot than to fight a persistent artifact.

Record what you learn in a short personal notes file: model name, what it honors, what it ignores, and the prompt patterns that worked. After two projects you will have a private playbook that is more useful than any generic list of tips.

Model generations move quickly, so treat any single recommendation as provisional. You can compare how different engines handle the same brief on the alternatives page and in the Seedance examples if you want a sense of range before committing.

Keeping characters and style consistent across shots

Consistency is where most AI video projects break down. A character reads as the same person across cuts because of a small number of repeatable anchors, not because of a long description.

  • Write a character card once. Five to eight fixed attributes: age range, hair, wardrobe, one distinguishing feature, posture, and vocal quality. Paste the card into every prompt word for word. Paraphrasing between shots is the single biggest cause of drift.
  • Anchor the wardrobe, not the face. Clothing, accessories, and hair silhouette survive generation far more reliably than facial detail. If a character must be recognizable in a wide shot, give them a strong silhouette.
  • Lock the grade. Write one style line for the project — the same lens family, contrast level, and color tendency — and reuse it. Consistency of grade makes small character differences read as different angles rather than different people.
  • Generate a reference still first. Produce a still image of the character and keep it beside your prompt. Even when the video model cannot accept the image directly, the still forces you to commit to specifics instead of improvising each shot.
  • Reuse seeds or reference frames where the tool allows. This is the cheapest consistency win available.

A practical trick: build the project's look in the AI image generator first. Stills are faster to iterate, and a locked still becomes the visual contract every video prompt has to match.

Coverage: prompting for an editable sequence

A single impressive clip is a demo. A sequence is a film. To make footage that actually cuts together, prompt for coverage the way an editor thinks.

  • Vary shot size deliberately. Alternate wide, medium, and close rather than generating five mediums. Editors need somewhere to breathe.
  • Overlap action slightly. Have each shot begin a beat before the previous one ends. Overlap gives you handles for the cut.
  • Generate a safety static. For any moving shot you love, also render a locked-off version of the same moment. It costs one extra generation and often saves the edit.
  • Shoot inserts. Hands, feet, doorways, screens, cups. Inserts are short, cheap, and cover continuity gaps.
  • Match direction of movement. If a subject exits frame right, the next shot should pull the eye left to right, or you will feel a jolt you cannot name.

When you assemble, cut on motion rather than on stillness. A cut placed mid-gesture hides small inconsistencies that a cut on a static frame will expose.

Common failure modes and how to fix them

Symptom Likely cause Fix
Subject morphs mid-clip Two conflicting actions or a vague subject Reduce to one action, add one distinguishing detail
Camera ignores the instruction Multiple simultaneous movements Keep a single move, state it early in the prompt
Footage feels flat No directional light Name a light source and its direction
Characters look different per shot Wardrobe paraphrased between prompts Paste an identical character card every time
Motion feels rushed No pace or timing cue Add a pace word and a beat cue
Limbs and hands break Hands doing complex tasks in close-up Reframe wider, simplify the action
Style drifts toward generic Vague style words Replace adjectives with three concrete visual traits
Dialogue looks out of sync Off-screen or obscured speaker Keep the mouth visible, shorten the line

Most of these failures are specificity failures, not model failures. Before you blame the engine, reread your prompt and count how many of the six layers are actually present.

A pre-render QA checklist

Rendering is the slow part, so review the prompt before you spend the time.

  1. Does the prompt describe exactly one moment?
  2. Is there one subject with at least one distinguishing detail?
  3. Is the light source named, with a direction?
  4. Is there exactly one camera behavior?
  5. Is the pace stated, and is there a timing cue?
  6. Are there three to five concrete style traits instead of mood adjectives?
  7. Does the character card appear verbatim?
  8. Is the audio layer written, or explicitly excluded?
  9. Is the word count under about one hundred and twenty?
  10. Would a stranger be able to sketch this frame from your description?

If two or more answers are no, rewrite before rendering. If everything is yes and the output still misses, change one layer at a time so you learn what moved the result.

Where to keep your prompts

Prompt writing compounds only if you keep the good ones. Maintain a simple library organized by shot type — establishing, character, insert, transition — with the model, prompt, and a one-line note on what worked. After a few projects, most of your new prompts are edits of old ones, and your first-take hit rate climbs fast.

You can start from the prompt library and the video templates rather than a blank page, then adapt the structure to your own subject and grade. Browsing other people's phrasing is the fastest way to expand your camera vocabulary.

FAQ

How long should an AI video prompt be? Roughly sixty to one hundred and twenty words. Long enough to cover the six layers, short enough that no layer contradicts another.

Should I describe the story or the frame? The frame. Write one beat per generation and let editing create the narrative.

Why do my characters change between shots? Almost always because the description was paraphrased. Use one identical character card pasted into every prompt, and lock the grade with a single reusable style line.

Do camera terms actually work? Specific, physical terms work: push in, tracking, low angle, shallow depth of field. Abstract praise does not. Calibrate each new model with a quick camera test.

How do I get better lighting? Name a source and a direction. Window light from camera left, a practical lamp behind the subject, hard sun at a low angle. Flat, sourceless lighting prompts produce flat, sourceless images.

What if the model adds things I did not ask for? Add a short exclusion line at the end of the prompt, and simplify anything that gives the model room to improvise — vague locations and crowded frames invite invention.

Is it worth generating audio in the model? For ambient beds and short lines with visible mouths, yes; it saves a step. For anything dialogue-heavy, record separately and treat the generated audio as a scratch track.

Turn prompts into finished scenes

Good prompting is a craft of compression: fewer words, sharper frame, one clear action, one camera move, one light. Build a character card, lock a grade, test each new model with a short calibration, and review with a checklist instead of a feeling. Do that and AI video stops feeling like a slot machine.

When you are ready to put the method to work, start a project in Orelon, pull a starting structure from the prompt library, and iterate shot by shot until the sequence cuts together. Cinematic ideas in motion begin with a prompt specific enough to be filmed.